![]() |
Urs Fisher Challenging the ideas of surface |
With teaching writing one couldn't follow the principles of a maths or science based course, these fields demands accurate, erudite knowledge, particular in engineering and medicine, and even the non-maths based law course.
Tutors teach by means of selecting singular students and opening with a question that the students has to answer to the fullest of their ability, and then the teacher carries out follow up questions. This line of enquiry expires when the tutor is satisfied. These techniques would be a disservice when operating in the field of the arts.
As I am three years in to my own course it has become visibly clear that a creative could not, or should not, have this kind of technique applied as most areas of discussion are subjective and dependent upon who's viewing or reading them. And so nothing is black nor white. Furthermore, practises vary too, there is no standard a writer can abide by, it's a personal craft dependent and unique to whom is creating it. Some people micro manage, others plan everything out in full detail on post-it notes all over their walls before they even start a sentence.
I do think the current system we have encountered of group-based work is the best structure for teaching writing, however, I think I would have the teacher interject further and prop up workshopping with particular elements students should pay attention to, like sentence construction, word choice, metaphors, how one achieves their voice. I think these techniques need to have a better understanding and focus in teaching.
--ST